stitchy_stitchy: (Default)
Dear Mrs. Righetti,

You had me from "Chapter 1: You Can Always Tell What's Wrong With The Garment By The Way The Model Is Posed, or, Slender Five Foot Ten Inch Models Look Good In Anything."

You sealed the deal with "Chapter 16: Buttonholes Are Bastards!"

Your book is not the most technical of the knitting references I've auditioned in the past month, but it is possibly the most fun. Certainly it is the only one I would recommend based solely on the chapter titles. Thanks for being you.

Love,
Me.

(In all seriousness, the thing you hear most often about "Knitting In Plain English" and its companion books is that either you love Maggie Righetti's authorial voice or you hate it, and that will make or break the books for you. Unlike Principles of Knitting, Readers Digest Handbook, or Vogue Knitting, this is a book I would hand to beginning knitters with the expectation that they could use the book to teach themselves to knit - if they didn't throw it across the room first.)
stitchy_stitchy: (Default)
So far I've gotten to look through and evaluate two big comprehensive knitting reference books from the library, in the name of picking one or the other to buy: the Reader's Digest Knitter's Handbook (1993 edition) by Montse Stanley, and Principles of Knitting (2012 edition) by June Hemmons Hiatt. I'm not 100% thrilled with either one.

Big problem with the Reader's Digest book: I don't always grok Stanley's diagrams. I looked at her descriptions of some kinds of increases and wasn't 100% sure what she was talking about, or how the diagram related to the text that referred to it.

Big problem with Principles of Knitting: Hiatt has decided that a lot of terminology commonly used by knitters is insufficiently precise (e.g. the term "front" can mean several different things when you're knitting a sweater) and so wrote the book using her own - admittedly precise! - terminology. I looked at her descriptions of some kinds of increases and wasn't 100% sure what she was talking about until I did a lot of cross-referencing. (This was another reason I'd dismissed Katharina Buss's book - it may be from lousy translation, since I think it was originally written in German, but things in the book weren't called what "everyone" calls them...) Possibly another big problem: the "big" problem. It's huge - nearly 700 slightly-oversized pages. Serious blunt force trauma potential. Do not drop on your toes. Also not something that can easily be tucked into your knitting bag. (eBook edition, anyone?)

The books are definitely aimed at different audiences - Stanley seems to aim more for the Ordinary Average Knitter, while Principles of Knitting could be used as a textbook for a college-level course in textiles. If I had to buy one of them today, it would probably be Principles - I'd rather have idiosyncratic terminology than unclear diagrams, and she also talks about around-the-neck tensioning as a thing rather than just mentioning that people do it that way in some parts of the world. Also, as noted by a Raveler - most of the stuff I'd be looking for in the Reader's Digest book can be found elsewhere, especially if I don't limit myself to dead-tree books, but there is nothing nearly as encyclopedic as Principles of Knitting.

I know there's a newer edition of Montse Stanley's book - I'm ordering it through Interlibrary Loan, in case the updated edition. (I love ILL. ILL is amazing.) Also, it turns out that the Ann Arbor library has a copy of the Vogue Knitting Ultimate Knitter's Handbook - just not on the shelf right now. It seems like a lot of these knitting references are in high demand, so I won't be able to continually renew any of the books...I'll just have to keep putting requests in, if I need to hang on to one for a while.
stitchy_stitchy: (Default)
Recently, the library let me borrow...
Mason Dixon Knitting Outside The Lines, by Kay Gardiner and Ann Shayne - I liked it even better than the first one. There were things in it that were not rectangles...which I think was the point. :) And the textual bits had me gasping for breath at some points (e.g. the page of advice for Knitting for Children Who Have Attained The Age Of Reason - which led into the awesomest sweater anyone has ever thought to put on a tween boy). Most of the adult garments were stronger fashion statements than I prefer to make, alas. (I think my boobs would not benefit from having knitted text on them.) If I had infinite shelf space, I would probably own both this book and its predecessor because Kay and Ann just crack me up so much...as it is, it might be checked out of the library repeatedly.

Mother-Daughter Knits, by Sally Melville and Caddy Melville Ledbetter - this was one of those books that really frustrated me, because the technical information (on fitting sweaters for length) was amazingly good but the patterns were so Not Me it wasn't even funny. I wish I could go to Sally's class on this to get the technical stuff as a handout; it would be worth the potential humiliation of making a life-sized paper doll of myself. (And the funny thing is, the more I look at the patterns, the more I think "Well maybe..." about some of them.) Again, probably not going to buy it - but I will check it out again when I get to the point of actually attempting to make a sweater for myself.
stitchy_stitchy: (Default)
Galina Khmeleva's article on Orenburg lace in this month's Piecework led me to wonder: what is the difference between a "gossamer" and a "warm shawl"? Teh Intarwebz had surprisingly little useful information on that topic - but there were references all over the place to her book: Gossamer webs : the history and techniques of Orenburg lace shawls, and my library actually had a copy. The book was informative (although it never did directly answer my question, except to mention that the warm shawls were knit with heavier yarn), covering the traditions involved in making and selling the shawls, the women who make them, and the work that goes into it. (Once again I'm flabbergasted by the amount of work put out by genuine "production knitters". I feel slow and inadequate, but that's pretty normal.) A big chunk of the book is taken up with the charts for a single, fairly large, shawl.

While I was at it, I also checked out A Gathering Of Lace, maybe the classic book of modern lace knitting - I'd seen a reference to it for a technique for starting a circular shawl without leaving a hole. Looking through the book did nothing to tone down my urge to knit a lace shawl - and now I have so many more to pick from! It's mostly a collection of patterns, but, with the exception of some of the sweaters, they're absolutely timeless. I might have to get my own copy; I had to get it through inter-library loan, so it's not even like I can go back and check the book out again whenever I want. And then I just need to figure out what I'm going to do with a half-dozen lace shawls...

Profile

stitchy_stitchy: (Default)
stitchy_stitchy

June 2017

S M T W T F S
    123
45678 910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930 

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 13th, 2025 03:21 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios